Present Tense

There was a fashion started a few years ago for new novels to be written using the present tense throughout. Sadly there is still a tendency for some authors to think this is the way books have to be written now. I really don’t like it at all. Using present tense to describe action that is occurring over several days just doesn’t work for me. Which doesn’t mean to say that it should never be used; it can be used in appropriate circumstances, e.g. when the action described is occurring over a short time period and there is a need to make this scene stand out in contrast to the rest of the novel.

Back in 2010, Philip Pullman (an author I greatly admire) made the case that the present tense should be used sparingly, giving an example of when it is used to good effect by quoting a passage from Jane Eyre. Charlotte Brontë switches to present tense when Jane meets Rochester by chance whilst out walking, thereby emphasising the importance of that moment in Jane’s memory.

I’d like to add another example. In Moon Tiger, Penelope Lively uses present tense for scenes involving her main character, Claudia, that take place in the present day, but past tense for all the scenes in Claudia’s past – i.e., most of the novel. The reader therefore knows immediately that they are back with Claudia in her hospital room when the tense switches to present.

And yes, I have used present tense in my novel Out of Time. When Slim Tucker writes his Great Moments in Music articles for the Harlem Hot Times (one of the devices I used to show the important events that subsequently sprung out of Slim’s actions) he often employs present tense to draw his Harlem readers into the moment.

I’m sure many readers have no problem with the present tense being used throughout a novel, maybe not even noticing it, content only with enjoying a good story. But I’m sure I’m not alone in finding this trait irritating, so why alienate a potential reader when there is no need to? I’m all for defying writing conventions – but there has to be a good reason for doing so.

Stranger Things

Everybody seems to be talking about Stranger Things. My son has been declaring for a while that it was good and that my wife and I should watch it. Kate Bush’s old song has rocketed up the charts on the strength of its inclusion in an episode. So we decided to give it a try, starting, of course, with Series 1. Within a few days we got to the last episode – and, yes, it is really good!

(Our link from Netflix to the telly decided to fall over, for no obvious reason, when we were about to watch episode 6. Fortunately we could huddle around the PC and watch it there, in the study, on a smaller screen – with the dark scenes looking very much darker. Such dedication! The following day, turning everything off and back on again seemed to do the trick and we could enjoy the last two episodes in our comfy chairs in the lounge again.)

Setting it in the 1980s makes a lot of sense – no ubiquitous mobile phones helping anxious parents to keep track on their youngsters wherever they roam means that there is more scope for building tension. And kids can’t get instant answers on their smart phones to try and solve a problem; they have to seek out someone to ask, decide who they can trust to help them.

The characters are strong and believable too. I particularly like Dustin, who reminds me a lot of Ben out of Outnumbered.

Looking forward to viewing the next three series.

© 2024 Chris Adams Ward

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑